Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression

From: Mike Tancsa <mike_at_sentex.net> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:57 -0500 · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC

At 05:55 AM 2/13/2009, Scott Long wrote:

>If, instead, it reports a value of '1', you are likely affected.  Note
>that it may be normal for USB memory devices to report a low number.
>Also, many legacy SCSI disks, and devices that are not disks, may 
>also be expected to report a low number.

Hi Scott,
         I tested with the patch on my areca controller, and it still 
reports 1 post patch.  (On RELENG_6, it shows 255 with the same controller)

         ---Mike