Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*?

From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:21:12 -0800

On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:

> How about the way that was done in GEOM_MBR? Defining a verb like  
> "write
> MBR", and supply the mbr as a parameter with gctl? (Currently used by
> boot0cfg).

There's already  averb to write bootcode, There's just no verb (yet)
to read bootcode.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt_at_mac.com

Received on Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:21:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sean Bruno: "HEADSUP: dev/firewire usr.sbin/fwcontrol"
Previous message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips"
In reply to: Ulf Lilleengen: "Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*?"
Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:42 UTC