On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:12:57AM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Folks, > > The '-std=c99'' only instructs GCC to allow the whole of C99. This is > clearly not enough, because this mode allows too many GCC extensions. If you > compile your code in "default' mode or just specify '-std=c99', then it's > very likely that you will eventually get stuck to GCC. Using this approach > you are reducing chances to switch to another C99 compiler. > > Though I am not aware of any other open source compiler supporting C99, I > beleive that there is great need for it. This discussion indicates that > there is real necessity for BSD-licensed C99 compiler. clang (clang.llvm.org) supports almost everything now and aims for full C99 support. pcc aims for full C99 too I believe Chris Mallon can comment better but I believe cparser is C99 too am I missing something?Received on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 21:22:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC