Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?

From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:52 +0100
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:53:56AM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> Roman,
> 
> >
> > clang (clang.llvm.org) supports almost everything now and aims for full
> > C99
> > support.
> >
> > pcc aims for full C99 too I believe
> >
> > Chris Mallon can comment better but I believe cparser is C99 too
> >
> > am I missing something?
> >
> This means that I am missing something and that '-pedantic' is all the more
> important.

well.... 

clang DEFINITELY aims to be drop-in replacement for gcc, ie. it supports (aims
to support) all the gcc extensions hence no -pedantic needed to be compatible
with gcc and clang at the same time

pcc discusses this now (http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/jira/browse/PCC-18)

from what Chris Mallon said I believe it's cparser's goal too to be drop-in
replacement for gcc


ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :)

honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing that 
the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as it
was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C standard
Received on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 22:03:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC