On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:53:56AM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Roman, > > > > > clang (clang.llvm.org) supports almost everything now and aims for full > > C99 > > support. > > > > pcc aims for full C99 too I believe > > > > Chris Mallon can comment better but I believe cparser is C99 too > > > > am I missing something? > > > This means that I am missing something and that '-pedantic' is all the more > important. well.... clang DEFINITELY aims to be drop-in replacement for gcc, ie. it supports (aims to support) all the gcc extensions hence no -pedantic needed to be compatible with gcc and clang at the same time pcc discusses this now (http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/jira/browse/PCC-18) from what Chris Mallon said I believe it's cparser's goal too to be drop-in replacement for gcc ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :) honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing that the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as it was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C standardReceived on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 22:03:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC