2009/1/10 Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org> > ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :) > > honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing > that > the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as > it > was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C > standard > > Well, since standards aim to document existing practice and not to invent things, your assumption sounds very reasonable. However, adoption of gcc extensions means that behavior of gcc is de-facto standard, more respected than ISO, for a group of developers. Sincerely, Alexander ChuranovReceived on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 22:37:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC