FWIW, I had some informal talk with brooks_at_ about this at EuroBSDCon: - groff(1) needs a C++ compiler so clang is not (yet) an option for the time being we will have to live with GCC or llvm-gcc. Some things we should consider: - Replacing groff with something less restricted that doesn't require C++: Heirloom-doctools may be an option. - More extensive testing of gcc-llvm: A USE_GCC= llvm for the ports tree would be nice. - Remove gcc from the base and make the compilation depend on a packaged C.. somewhat like was made with perl. binutils is yet another issue: I am hoping this will be updated to the latest GPL2 version while a new alternative is developed. Perhaps a combination of RH elfutils and our own libelf efforts would make a viable alternative. just my $0.02, Pedro.Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 02:22:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC