Re: Alternatives to gcc

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:37:11 +0100

"Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip_at_tutopia.com> writes:
> - Replacing groff with something less restricted that doesn't require
> C++: Heirloom-doctools may be an option.

groff is not the only C++ program in the base system; there is also
devd.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Sat Jan 17 2009 - 13:37:12 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Alternatives to gcc"
Previous message: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: INET6 tcp md5 signature"
In reply to: Pedro F. Giffuni: "Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"
Next in thread: David O'Brien: "Re: Alternatives to gcc"
Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: Alternatives to gcc"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC