-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:28 +0100 Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org> mentioned: > hi > > I noticed there is an update to lex/flex. The version in our tree > is ancient and there seems to be some updates (http://flex.sourceforge.net/) > > Can someone comment on the state of lex in our tree? It's not considered > a contributed software (it resides in usr.bin) but it was taken from elsewhere. > > what is our position? is it preferable for me to work on updating it or > just fixing the one bug I ran into? > > thnx! > > roman Are there any benefits in updating? Does it worth the hassle? We have this version of flex in ports for those who needs extended features. If there're no critical echancements/fixes in the updated flex version I'd prefer to stay with what we have and just fix the bugs encountered locally. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAklsPXQACgkQK/VZk+smlYGzJQCfcM5KxhDxcJNva3m6A/xREsF4 8V4An0+ICazLoWg1IJNB+uIJZNk2lWpM =wBWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:496c3d74967002107598870!Received on Tue Jan 13 2009 - 06:06:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC