Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)

From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:04:21 -0500

> Smells like FUD to me. In all of my reading, I have never seen such a
> claim. There may be some GPLv3 issues, but I seriously doubt this is
> one.
Which leads to my next question: why not upgrade?

-- 
Eitan Adler
"Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave."
-Jakob Nielsen

Received on Tue Jan 13 2009 - 21:04:34 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roman Divacky: "Re: [PATCH]: set C dialect when compiling world"
Previous message: Roman Divacky: "[PATCH]: set C dialect when compiling world"
In reply to: Kevin Oberman: "Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"
Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"
Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC