On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:44:36PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:38:56PM -0000, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: > > >Doug Barton schrieb: > > >>Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: > > >>>At the moment you can already compile gcc 4.3 from the ports tree, > > >>>however things like binutils only seems to exist in the ports as a cross > > >>>compiling tool. How hard would it be to add binutils as a port and make > > >>>the gcc 4.x ports dependent on it? This way you can install gcc 4.3 with > > >>>the assembler and linker that play nice together during the build? At > > >>>the moment, I have had to make binutils from a gnu downloaded source and > > >>>then make gcc 4.3 with a silly make, IE: make AS=/usr/local/bin/as > > >>>.......... > > >> > > >>I think this would be an excellent approach. I am not sure I agree > > >>with the idea that we _must_ have a compiler toolchain in the base but > > >>it should definitely be possible to "replace" the toolchain in the > > >>base with one from ports with a minimum of hassle. > > > > I'm not sure I like the idea of not having _a_ compiler in the base. I'm > > not really sure how that would work when you wanted to update and build the > > sources. I suppose you would need to install a binary port of the compiler > > (et. all) before you could build a more recent tool-chain. > > > > Perhapse another option.... > > > > If gcc 4.2 && buildtools 2.15 is the end of the road for what BSD is > > has anyone actually LOOKED? I think the binutils are still under gplv2 > > at least this is what their root COPYRIGHT file says > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/COPYING?cvsroot=src > It's not true. http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/?cvsroot=src See COPYING. -- SteveReceived on Wed Jan 14 2009 - 14:25:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC