Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?)

From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:26:28 +0100
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:25:24AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:44:36PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:38:56PM -0000, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > > >Doug Barton schrieb:
> > > >>Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > > >>>At the moment you can already compile gcc 4.3 from the ports tree, 
> > > >>>however things like binutils only seems to exist in the ports as a cross 
> > > >>>compiling tool. How hard would it be to add binutils as a port and make 
> > > >>>the gcc 4.x ports dependent on it? This way you can install gcc 4.3 with 
> > > >>>the assembler and linker that play nice together during the build? At 
> > > >>>the moment, I have had to make binutils from a gnu downloaded source and 
> > > >>>then make gcc 4.3 with a silly make, IE: make AS=/usr/local/bin/as 
> > > >>>..........
> > > >>
> > > >>I think this would be an excellent approach. I am not sure I agree
> > > >>with the idea that we _must_ have a compiler toolchain in the base but
> > > >>it should definitely be possible to "replace" the toolchain in the
> > > >>base with one from ports with a minimum of hassle.
> > > 
> > >    I'm not sure I like the idea of not having _a_ compiler in the base. I'm 
> > > not really sure how that would work when you wanted to update and build the 
> > > sources. I suppose you would need to install a binary port of the compiler 
> > > (et. all) before you could build a more recent tool-chain.
> > > 
> > >    Perhapse another option....
> > > 
> > >    If gcc 4.2 && buildtools 2.15 is the end of the road for what BSD is 
> > 
> > has anyone actually LOOKED? I think the binutils are still under gplv2
> > 
> > at least this is what their root COPYRIGHT file says
> > 
> > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/COPYING?cvsroot=src
> > 
> 
> It's not true.
> 
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/?cvsroot=src
> 
> See COPYING.

so something is GPLv3 and something is still GPLv2.... too bad gas
falls into the v3 category :(
Received on Wed Jan 14 2009 - 14:26:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC