In message <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1-A42CF4263B9E_at_siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Gu ibert de Bruet writes: >>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? >> >> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that >> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. >> >> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID >> specification. > >PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind >committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to >produce the bits required for usb2 as well? USB2 patches should go to HPS_at_ still I think ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Sat Jan 17 2009 - 00:30:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC