On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1- > A42CF4263B9E_at_siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de Bruet writes: > >>>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? >>> >>> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that >>> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. >>> >>> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID >>> specification. >> >> PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind >> committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to >> produce the bits required for usb2 as well? > > USB2 patches should go to HPS_at_ still I think ? I have attached the 4x20 quirk patch for hpsusb. Thanks for all of your hard work! Cheers, Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 436f 6465 2070 6f65 742e 2042 6974 206a */ /* Managing Partner * 6f63 6b65 792e 2053 7973 4164 6d69 6e2e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 2055 4e49 5820 736c 6575 7468 2e00 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * C/C++, Java, Perl, PHP, SQL, XHTML, XML */
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC