On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1- > > > > A42CF4263B9E_at_siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de Bruet writes: > >>>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? > >>> > >>> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that > >>> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. > >>> > >>> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID > >>> specification. > >> > >> PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind > >> committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to > >> produce the bits required for usb2 as well? > > > > USB2 patches should go to HPS_at_ still I think ? > > I have attached the 4x20 quirk patch for hpsusb. > Hi, Committed to P4. And my private SVN. Will go into -current early next week. http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=156420 --HPSReceived on Tue Jan 20 2009 - 08:35:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC