On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> From: Poul-Henning Kamp >> >> In message >> <C6F61B9C-A765-4F35-9BF7-E744B2F19C99_at_siliconlandmark.com>, >> Andre Guibert de Bruet writes: >>> On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:09 AM, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>>>> Unfortunately the PicoLCD 2X20 and 4X20 devices present themselves >>>>> as HID devices. >>>> >>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? >> >> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because >> that is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. >> >> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID >> specification. > > Ah. That's not "unfortunate", that's just sheer laziness on > iTuner's part. > Great, and I just bought one too. Welp, here's hoping whatever > nonstandard > protocol they do use works reasonably, and that the mfg gets their act > together on the next one. The iTuner parts are firmware upgradable, so there is hope. The Picolcd.com SDK has code that does the flashing on Windows so it would be a matter of porting it, if firmware that addresses the issue becomes available. I have purchased a couple of these and they've worked with LCDproc CVS HEAD with the quirk. I just upgraded my testbed to CURRENT and will be producing the appropriate patch for the USB2 stack, later tonight. Cheers, Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 436f 6465 2070 6f65 742e 2042 6974 206a */ /* Managing Partner * 6f63 6b65 792e 2053 7973 4164 6d69 6e2e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 2055 4e49 5820 736c 6575 7468 2e00 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * C/C++, Java, Perl, PHP, SQL, XHTML, XML */Received on Mon Jan 19 2009 - 18:19:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:40 UTC