on 10/07/2009 05:54 Tim Kientzle said the following: > > Instead of just storing tsc_freq at each frequency change, > you really need: > * Last timestamp just before frequency change (t0) > * new frequency (f) > * TSC value at frequency change (c0) > > Then > t = t0 + (rdtsc() - c0) / f > > Of course, I haven't looked at the code to tell > what your range limitations are. Yes, tracking the TSC frequency changes should allow us to have correct DTrace timecounting. But I am not sure if we really need this (or can have this). Because otherwise I can not see why we have a distinct/specialized DTrace TSC-based timecounting when we already have general purpose TSC timecounting that already works correctly (if I am not mistaken). -- Andriy GaponReceived on Fri Jul 10 2009 - 03:50:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:51 UTC