Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

From: Randy Bush <randy_at_psg.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:22:34 +0900

> To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need
> to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically
> configured to do dhcp or anything else[0].

such as detected by services such as bind/unbound?

randy

Received on Tue Jun 02 2009 - 20:22:35 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v"
Previous message: Randy Bush: "Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?"
In reply to: Brooks Davis: "Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?"
Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?"
Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC