Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) 32 _at_ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1990

From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:23 -0400
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 07:12 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 07:01 pm, Kip Macy wrote:
> > A M_WAITOK allocation while holding a lock will do this.
>
> No, it does not because it may be used in interrupt handler context
> with a spin lock held (e.g., GPE handler).

I meant "a M_WAITOK allocation while holding a lock" is not the case 
here.  It is "you shall not malloc(9) while holding a spin lock" 
case.

Jung-uk Kim
Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 21:17:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC