Re: suspect bug in vge(4)

From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:29:23 +0900
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:18:11PM +0200, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >I already know there are possible edge-cases in vge(4) but your
> >issue looks quite different one than ever reported. Unfortunately
> >vge(4) hardware I had was broken so I couldn't complete overhauling
> >the vge(4). The code in the following URL is the latest WIP version
> >but I don't know whether it fixes the issue as it wasn't tested at
> >all on real hardware.
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vge/if_vge.c
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vge/if_vgereg.h
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vge/if_vgevar.h
> >
> These files contain a CVS Id dating them 2007-11-22 while CURRENT has 
> 2009-05-30. Assuming these dates are reliable this means the patches are 
> roughly 19 months old and AFAIK 1000BaseTX support was added within the 
> last 6 months. I do not believe reverting back makes sense, if you know 
> better, please tell me.
> 

You can ignore the date. The cvs id was there as I wanted to know
which was the base revision when I started working on vge(4).

> There is another interesting patch aside which deals with TXCSUM
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/vge/vge.csum.patch
> However, it is already included in CURRENT.
> 
> More ideas?

As you said the checksum patch already committed and I believe it
has no relation with your issue.
Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 22:26:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC