flash10 vs f10

From: Boris Samorodov <bsam_at_ipt.ru>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:46:30 +0400
Juergen Lock <nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:

>  Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10:  I got that going after
> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10)
> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl:
> 	libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm
> and
> 	libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm
> (so we'll need two new ports for these),

Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports
that something doesn't work without those libraries.

> and then finally to get
> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to
> 	ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6
> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to
> avoid that symlink.

Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit
a new port. Thanks!


WBR
-- 
bsam
Received on Fri Jun 26 2009 - 15:45:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC