Re: flash10 vs f10

From: Sean C. Farley <scf_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:17:17 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:

> Juergen Lock <nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:
>
>>  Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
>> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10:  I got that going after
>> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10)
>> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl:
>> 	libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm
>> and
>> 	libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm
>> (so we'll need two new ports for these),
>
> Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports
> that something doesn't work without those libraries.
>
>> and then finally to get
>> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to
>> 	ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6
>> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to
>> avoid that symlink.
>
> Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit
> a new port. Thanks!

Here you go (at least for the binary):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-June/006401.html

Sean
-- 
scf_at_FreeBSD.org
Received on Fri Jun 26 2009 - 16:17:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC