Re: flash10 vs f10

"Sean C. Farley" <scf_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> Juergen Lock <nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:
>>
>>>  Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
>>> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10:  I got that going after
>>> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10)
>>> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl:
>>> 	libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm
>>> and
>>> 	libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm
>>> (so we'll need two new ports for these),
>>
>> Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports
>> that something doesn't work without those libraries.
>>
>>> and then finally to get
>>> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to
>>> 	ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6
>>> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to
>>> avoid that symlink.
>>
>> Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit
>> a new port. Thanks!
>
> Here you go (at least for the binary):
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-June/006401.html

OK, thanks! I should have missed you previous post.

Here is a port for tests. This shar should be run at /usr/ports/www:
ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/linux/linux-f10-flashplugin10.shar

Note: the port is only hand-written and tested to build/install/deinstall.


WBR
-- 
bsam