Re: recent boot0 changes dropped a partition type?

From: Aragon Gouveia <aragon_at_phat.za.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:17:51 +0200
Hi,

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> yes it was removed to save space, i am more than happy to replace 0xb
> with 0xc if the latter turns out to be more popular.
> 
> So far we have the following (all the rest is basically commented
> out because we need space for other stuff):
> 
> 	131	linux
> 	165	FreeBSD
> 	166	[Open]BSD
> 	169	[Net]BSD
> 	6	Win [FAT16 >= 32MB]
> 	7	Win [NTFS]
> 	11	Win [FAT32]
> 
> Suggestions for replacements are welcome

 From my bit of research now, it looks like types 6 and 11 should be 
changed.  Their modern equivalents are 0xE and 0xC respectively.  I 
think the only Redmond systems that still use 0x6 and 0xB pre-date 
Windows XP.  I'm basing my opinions on personal experience and:

http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table

The only caveat I see is:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/151414

But with limited space we probably should just decide to not worry about 
anything older than Windows XP...


Thanks,
Aragon
Received on Sun Jun 28 2009 - 17:18:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC