> > When I compile and run the attached program, it panics my system, (FreeBSD >>> CURRENT as of 2-20-09) with the following message: >>> >>> panic: Assertion pi != NULL failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_umtx: 1464 >>> >>> With the backtrace being: >>> Tracing pid 1079 tid 100045 td 0xffffff00037c8000 >>> kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x40 >>> panic() at panic+0x1ec >>> umtx_pi_adjust() at umtx_pi_adjust+0xfc8 >>> umtx_pi_adjust() at umtx_pi_adjust+0x19bd >>> _umtx_unlock() at _umtx_unlock+0x2c41 >>> _umtx_op() at _umtx_op+0x22 >>> syscall() at syscall+0x1f4 >>> Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xaa >>> --- syscall (454, FreeBSD ELF64, _umtx_op), rip = 0x4056ac, rsp = >>> 0x7fffffbfef38, rbp = 0x80060b150 --- >>> >>> This problem only shows up when I use PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT -- if I change >>> the line for pthread_mutexattr_setprotocol to PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE, then it >>> works fine. I've been trying to trace thru the code to figure out where >>> uq_pi_blocked should be setup, but I'm not too familiar with the code so >>> I >>> haven't found where the problem originates. How can I get >>> PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT to work? And even if the change is in user-space, >>> it >>> probably shouldn't be this easy to panic the kernel :-) >>> >>> -Justin >>> >>> > There is a bug about NULL pointer, please try the patch, it also > fixes a possible wake-up race. > > http://people.freebsd.org/%7Edavidxu/patch/kern_umtx_prio.patch > > > David Xu > > That definitely looks like it fixes it for my system -- thanks for the quick response!!Received on Wed Mar 11 2009 - 02:04:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:43 UTC