On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:12:50AM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: > There's still a change to offer your input on the new jails before they > go in! OK, given the lack of response so far, it's less "still a > chance" than "please?". Current plans are to have this in place for > 8.0, with connections to the ongoing Vimage work. Hopefully the silence > is approval, and commits will likely be appearing soon. I have not tried this, but I think this patch may allow jailed roots to escape. The problem is that there is only one fd_jdir. The escape would go like: jailed root creates a new jail in a subdirectory, opens its / and sends the fd to a process in the new jail via a unix domain socket. When the process calls fchdir on the fd, it will be able to access .. normally. With nested chroot, or chroot in jail, this is not possible, because fd_jdir always contains the first jail or chroot done and will not allow escaping from it; however, root in a level 2 chroot can escape back to level 1 using chroot. -- Jilles TjoelkerReceived on Thu May 14 2009 - 16:15:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:47 UTC