Le Friday 22 May 2009, Stefan Bethke a écrit : > Am 22.05.2009 um 12:15 schrieb Daichi GOTO: > > I have ifconfig(8) panic issue like you. > > > > With current, just do ifconfig(8) like follow leads panic. > > > > ifconfig re0 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy > > > > I have tried on board re0 and attached fxp0, both have the > > same result. > > > > Anyone has any ideas around these panic issues? By my > > little research, kernel/world up until to 12/05/2009 03:00 > > has no problem. At least, kernel/world at 19/05/2009 JST > > has above panic issue. > > I've checked from single-user mode, and the panic is indeed triggered > by the address assignment. > > # sh ifc > ifconfig bridge0ke inet 44.128.65.rn1/28 > + ifconfigel bridge0 inet 44 t.128.65.1/28 > rap 9 with interrupts disabled > > > Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80323f5b > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff8076524760 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff8076524770 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 48 (ifconfig) > [thread pid 48 tid 100056 ] > Stopped at turnstile_setowner+0x2b: movq %rcx,0x68(%rdx) > > A kernel compiled from the same sources with practically identical > configuration (GENERIC minus most devices) running inside VMware (but > also SMP) does not exhibit this issue. > Hello, FWIW, I'm running two machines with recent -current builds (one csuped yesterday, around 1800GMT, the other the day before), and the network interfaces are working fine (dc(4) for one and rl(4) for the other). In both cases, the kernel config is GENERIC, minus SMP, WITNESS and INVARIANTS. TfH > > StefanReceived on Fri May 22 2009 - 10:09:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:48 UTC