Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: >> The change is recent, to unificate ipv4 and ipv6 rc code. We have >> ipv4_addrs_IF that uses the former syntax, but why not ipv6_addrs_IF, >> too? > > Is this a question to me? Of course, no :-) > I already expected that this is some regression because of the IPv6 > changes, but still: intended or not? If yes -> missing UPDATING entry. CCed hrs_at_ for this regression and brooks_at_ for the ipv4_addrs_IF change. -- Alex DupreReceived on Thu Oct 01 2009 - 05:28:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC