Derek (freebsd lists) wrote: > I've been testing the new siis driver, and I have found no > appreciable performance change, using dd as a measure of "raw" > performance. On linear read/write, without port multipliers used, performance of siis driver is not so much differs from legacy driver. The most of it's benefits are NCQ, FIS-based switching and command queuing affect mostly highly parallel random workload. > I get about 40MB/s read, and 30MB/s write. See attached > bench-*.txt files. It's too small, indeed. Actually, there are two different kinds of siis compatible devices: SiI3124 and SiI3132/SiI3531. SiI3124 is more expensive PCI-X card, sometimes it goes with built-in PCIe x4 bridge. To operate effectively it needs effective bus. Inserting it to usual PCI or PCIe x1 slot kills any hope. SiI3132/SiI3531 same time are cheap PCIe x1 cards. Nobody have ever seen them giving more 130-150MB/s, even looking that PCIe x1 should give 2.5Gb/s. > Am I expecting too much, or do I have something else going on > here? (e.g. dd being a terrible benchmark of disk i/o) > > Is anyone else seeing better/worse/same numbers? I have posted my micro benchmarks here: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A95A3CA.3060306 > Also I find it surprising that my gmirror read is only 40MB/s, > and not 60-80MB/s, any thoughts on this? To completely load gmirror on read operations, you may need to run two dd's same time. Also make sure, that your gmirror runs in round-robin mode. Default split mode, which should help with linear read, is IMHO ineffective, at least with default MAXPHYS and slice values. For maximum linear I/O performance you may want to build kernel with options MAXPHYS=(1024*1024) If you are doing many linear reads from file system, increase vfs.read_max sysctl. -- Alexander MotinReceived on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 12:51:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:54 UTC