Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base)

From: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:11:37 -0300
On 9/22/09, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
>
>> With all due respect, I already know that .. it's pretty clear in the
>> different manuals, hanbooks and how-ro's ... and that's exactly why I
>> never asked how can I remove sendmail and replace it with dma .. the
>> question was more inclined in the way: why such a heavywheight (which
>> is what a lot of users seem to be saying, and I agree with them) when
>> we could do just as well with dma
>
> So do it already. :)  A lot of people have talked about this, but no
> one has put code where their mouth is. Create a POC and post it to
> -arch, then we have something concrete to discuss. And please, don't
> bother with the "But I don't want to do the work if it isn't going to
> be accepted into the base" argument. There are way more than enough
> people whinging about this topic that your work will have an
> appreciative audience, which is all the reward we get around here.

Dear Doug:

Those words were just an explanation to Steve Kargl's misleading
interpretation of my former e-mail.

>> (let alone the fact that we could
>> then cooperate with DragonFly, creating synergy, advancing toghether
>> towards the same goal amongst a plenty of other advantages).
>
> While those are nice words I don't think they have any meaning in the
> real world. We're dealing with a technical issue, we need to keep the
> discussion on technical terms.

Oh they do .. believe me ... specially to me, the paying customer =)

Regards
Gonzalo
Received on Tue Sep 22 2009 - 19:11:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:55 UTC