On 2009-09-23 13:24:48 (-0700), Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pretty sure the device id for 88E1116 PHY is 0x21. Do you see > printed model number 88E1118 on your hardware? If so I have no idea > why Marvell use the same device id. Do you have access to 88E1118 > HY data sheet? > I've just double checked. The documentation from TS claims it's an 88E1118 and that's what I see on the chip itself as well. I don't have access to the data sheet, that would make this exercise far too easy. > I wanted to know advertised PHY capabilities as mge(4) explicitly > disabled 1000baseT/half-duplex mode in driver layer. But MV88F5182 > data sheet said it supports 1000baseT/half-duplex mode. > I'll try to find out tomorrow. I'm not sure if it'll matter though, as the switch I'm using right now is a 10/100 model. > > > I'm not author of mge(4) so I'm not familiar with mge(4). But it > > > seems that mge(4) lacks link state change handler. Normally NICs > > > are required to reprogram MAC to match resolved speed/duplex/ > > > flow-control of link when it know it established a valid link which > > > is notified from mii(4). > > > > > If that's the case I'd expect the driver not to work on my Sheevaplug > > either. The only difference I see is the PHY. > > > > Could be, but if you manually set media it reinitializes PHY and it > will call mge_ifmedia_upd() which in turn reinitializes the > controller. I guess this is workaround in mge(4). > Do you mean setting the media through an ioctl by 'manually set media'? If so, that doesn't really apply for either the TS-7800 or the Sheevaplug as both need the network to work before userspace can do anything. KristofReceived on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 18:55:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC