On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 2009-09-22 16:53:50 (-0700), Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:10:18PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote: > > > I've been trying to get CURRENT running on a TS-7800 [1]. > > > It's based around a Marvell Orion SoC, with a Marvell 88E1118 PHY. > > > > > > It boots and tries to do bootpc_init. This fails because there are no > > > packets coming in or going out. > > > > > > A few thing's I've noticed: > > > - The PHY is misdetected as an 88E1116. Changing sys/dev/mii/miidevs so > > > it's detected as the 88E1118 it really is doesn't help. > > > > Please show me the output of "devinfo -rv | grep phy". > > > A little difficult as I need networking to get the root file system. > Instead I've got the content of the PHY ID 1 & 2 registers: > mii_id1: 0x0141, mii_id2: 0x0e11 > This seems to translate to a mii_model of 0x21, which corresponds to a > 'Marvell 88E1116 Gigabit PHY' according to sys/dev/mii/miidevs. > I'm pretty sure the device id for 88E1116 PHY is 0x21. Do you see printed model number 88E1118 on your hardware? If so I have no idea why Marvell use the same device id. Do you have access to 88E1118 HY data sheet? > > > - sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c appears to contain a bug: > > > e1000phy_reset performs a switch on MII_MODEL(esc->mii_model) while > > > the rest of the code just uses esc->mii_model. This seems to be wrong > > > as the cases for 1118 (or 1116) are not triggered. Changing this also > > > doesn't appear to help. > > > > It's not a bug. First, I have to see your PHY id to know why you > > think so. > > > The switch on line 251 in e1000phy.c [1] is the only place the MII_MODEL > macro is used. The rest of the file (even in an earlier switch in the > same function) uses esc->mii_model directly. I've also confirmed the code > falls into the default case instead of the case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116 > as I'd expect (because it detects the PHY as an E1116). > > The esc->mii_model value is already translated by MII_MODEL on line 147. > Ah, you're right, mii_model was already translated. Thanks for pointing out. > > > - Forcing the mge driver to IFM_100_TX (in mge_set_port_serial_control) > > > does work. The system manages to acquire a DHCP address. > > > > Would you also show me the output of "ifconfig -m mge0"? > > > What are you looking for? I can't run ifconfig obviously, but I can > probably extract the required information with a few strategic printfs. > I wanted to know advertised PHY capabilities as mge(4) explicitly disabled 1000baseT/half-duplex mode in driver layer. But MV88F5182 data sheet said it supports 1000baseT/half-duplex mode. > > I'm not author of mge(4) so I'm not familiar with mge(4). But it > > seems that mge(4) lacks link state change handler. Normally NICs > > are required to reprogram MAC to match resolved speed/duplex/ > > flow-control of link when it know it established a valid link which > > is notified from mii(4). > > > If that's the case I'd expect the driver not to work on my Sheevaplug > either. The only difference I see is the PHY. > Could be, but if you manually set media it reinitializes PHY and it will call mge_ifmedia_upd() which in turn reinitializes the controller. I guess this is workaround in mge(4). > Thanks, > Kristof > > [1] http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c?annotate=196366Received on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 19:24:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC