John Hay wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:27:04AM -0700, Li, Qing wrote: >>> Li, Qing wrote: >>>>> Me and many other people running net/mpd handling thousands of PtP >>>>> interfaces sharing local addresses with each other and with some >>>>> Ethernet interface. This change makes such setup inoperable, as mpd >>>>> will constantly receive errors while trying to set addresses and >>>>> drop connections. >>>> I can revert to the old behavior. I asked for feedback and >> received >>>> none at the time ... >>> I would like to see it working, but working correctly. If it is not >>> possible to implement it correctly - then reverted, or at least >>> disabled >>> by default. >>> >> Asking for compatibility is reasonable but the existing packet >> leaking behavior is incorrect. >> >> After reviewing the previous thread on this topic back in July, >> I see that Henri Hennebert requested this feature for IPv6. >> >> I intend to introduce a sysctl variable to control whether loopback >> route should be installed for the local end point. By default >> the old behavior maintained. > > What about only adding the route if it does not exist yet? That should > handle the common case of reusing your ip address on the ethernet > interface on the local side of point-to-point links. the hard part is removing it if it is the last interface that uses it. > > JohnReceived on Fri Sep 25 2009 - 14:29:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC