Re: Results of BIND RFC

From: Denny Lin <dennylin93_at_hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:27:36 +0800
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
> >sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision.  How hard
> >it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the
> >critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving
> >the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port?
> 
> Hi, All.
> 
> I'm agree with Stas. If it is not so hard to maintain "bind-tools" in the 
> base,
> It is very useful to still having them in base system.

+1 here. Dig and some of the other tools are extremely useful and
important, so it would be nice if they were in the base system instead
of a separate port.

-- 
Denny Lin
Received on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 09:45:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC