On 2 April 2010, at 04:27, Denny Lin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >>> While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not >>> sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard >>> it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the >>> critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving >>> the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port? >> >> Hi, All. >> >> I'm agree with Stas. If it is not so hard to maintain "bind-tools" in the >> base, >> It is very useful to still having them in base system. > > +1 here. Dig and some of the other tools are extremely useful and > important, so it would be nice if they were in the base system instead > of a separate port. The reason dig and nslookup are used is because you have a problem with the internet connection. Thats a bit late to say "you need to install the DNS tools". If you could, you wouldn't need them. Not everyone will create a ports CD.Received on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 16:10:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC