on 02/04/2010 22:26 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > OK, I did it again. > I tested the below patch using the scenario described above. > Could you please review and/or test this patch? > If you like it and it works, I can commit it. > Thanks! > > --- a/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c > +++ b/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c > _at__at_ -427,6 +427,9 _at__at_ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > if (bpb.bpbBytesPerSec < MINBPS) > errx(1, "bytes/sector (%u) is too small; minimum is %u", > bpb.bpbBytesPerSec, MINBPS); > + bpb.bpbSecPerClust /= (bpb.bpbBytesPerSec / MINBPS); > + if (bpb.bpbSecPerClust == 0) > + bpb.bpbSecPerClust = 1; > if (!(fat = opt_F)) { > if (opt_f) > fat = 12; > And here is a safer one (in case of a huge sector size > 32KB). I will appreciate any testing with real media that you might have. diff --git a/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c b/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c index 955c3a5..3f2778d 100644 --- a/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c +++ b/sbin/newfs_msdos/newfs_msdos.c _at__at_ -427,6 +427,12 _at__at_ main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (bpb.bpbBytesPerSec < MINBPS) errx(1, "bytes/sector (%u) is too small; minimum is %u", bpb.bpbBytesPerSec, MINBPS); + bpb.bpbSecPerClust /= (bpb.bpbBytesPerSec / MINBPS); + if (bpb.bpbSecPerClust == 0) + bpb.bpbSecPerClust = 1; + if (bpb.bpbSecPerClust * bpb.bpbBytesPerSec > 32 * 1024) + errx(1, "bytes per sector (%u) is greater than 32k", + bpb.bpbSecPerClust * bpb.bpbBytesPerSec); if (!(fat = opt_F)) { if (opt_f) fat = 12; -- Andriy GaponReceived on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 17:31:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC