On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Navdeep Parhar <nparhar_at_gmail.com> (from Wed, 21 Apr 2010 > 18:23:33 -0700): > > >Your patch works for me, thanks. There is just one more problem with the CTF > > I found a case where it does not work (not kernel related), I have > another one which works better. > > >generation that needs to be fixed: > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2009-April/028244.html > > > >While you're here can you take a look at the patch in that email too? > > Looks good in concept, but the CTFMERGE line needs the same > treatment like all the other ones in the .mk files. I want to commit > a suitable change today. Does "same treatment" mean it should run silently too? My personal opinion is that all ctfconvert and ctfmerge commands should show up in the output of make iff they run. I believe that used to be the case before r206082. Regards, NavdeepReceived on Thu Apr 22 2010 - 06:33:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC