On Thursday 29 April 2010 02:40:24 Dima Panov wrote: > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote: > > According to Dima Panov: > > > while building lang/ruby18: > > Which options to you use? > > > > _OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1 > > WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true > > WITH_RDOC=true > > WITHOUT_DEBUG=true > > > > I notice your ruby is compiling w/o any -On, try with -O at least? > > same here. also on 1.8.7.249 snapshot. > > ar rcu libruby18-static.a array.o bignum.o class.o compar.o dir.o > dln.o enum.o enumerator.o error.o eval.o file.o gc.o hash.o inits.o > io.o marshal.o math.o numeric.o object.o pack.o parse.o process.o > prec.o random.o range.o re.o regex.o ruby.o signal.o sprintf.o st.o > string.o struct.o time.o util.o variable.o version.o dmyext.o > clang -I/usr/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -std=gnu89 -fPIC > -DRUBY_EXPORT -I. -I. -I/usr/include -c main.c > clang -I/usr/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -std=gnu89 -fPIC > -DRUBY_EXPORT -L. -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread -rdynamic > -pthread main.o libruby18-static.a - lrt -lcrypt -lm -L/usr/lib > -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread -o miniruby > ./lib/fileutils.rb:1437: [BUG] unexpected local variable assignment ruby > 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [amd64-freebsd9] > > *** Signal 6 > > Stop in /tmp/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p249. > *** Error code 1 > > > _OPTIONS_READ=ruby-1.8.7.249,1 > WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true > WITH_RDOC=true > WITHOUT_DEBUG=true > > > > clang -I/usr/include -pipe -g -g -std=gnu89 -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -I. > > > -I. -I/usr/include -c main.c > > > clang -I/usr/include -pipe -g -g -std=gnu89 -fPIC -DRUBY_EXPORT -L. > > > - rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread -rdynamic -pthread main.o > > > libruby18-static.a -lrt -lcrypt -lm -L/usr/lib > > > -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread -o miniruby > > > ./lib/fileutils.rb:1429: fu_same? is not a class/module (TypeError) > > > > > > from ./mkconfig.rb:11:in `require' > > > from ./mkconfig.rb:11 > > > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Interesting, using a fairly recent clang snapshot from trunk, I get a > > sig11 > > > > :( > > Ruby is bad? clangbsd errors in my blog: http://dimapanov.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/clangbsd/ at this moment unbuildable some critical ports: devel/binutils devel/icu[4] devel/pcre lang/ruby1[89] -- Dima "Red Fox" Panov _at_ Home | C73E 2B72 1FFD 61BD E206 1234 A626 76ED 93E3 B018 Khabarovsk, Russia | 2D30 2CCB 9984 130C 6F87 BAFC FB8B A09D D539 8F29 KDE_at_FreeBSD Team | FreeBSD committer since 10.08.2009 | FreeBSD since Sept 1995 Twitter.com:fluffy_khv | Skype:dima.panov | Jabber.org:fluffy.khv | ICQ:1745024Received on Thu Apr 29 2010 - 09:05:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC