In message: <894C8953-7F2F-486F-8701-A3DFF65D7627_at_kientzle.com> Tim Kientzle <tim_at_kientzle.com> writes: : : On Aug 15, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote: : : > On 15 Aug 2010, at 3:12, Doug Barton wrote: : > : >> (And before anyone bothers to reply saying "Use pkg_info -O for that" : >> I'll save you the trouble. My version is from 10-20% faster. Not sure : >> why, don't really care.) :) : > : > : > Congrats for beating the performance of a(nother) utility in base, but - regardless of whether you'd use it in that case - doesn't that just indicate that pkg_info could use some performance improvements as well? : : http://libpkg.googlecode.com/ : : This is David Forsyth's GSoC project to build a standard library : for managing the on-disk package database. : : His pkg_info implementation built on this library is in fact : a lot faster than what's currently in the tree. He's starting : to prototype pkg_delete and pkg_add on the new library : but there's still a lot of work to do. heh, maybe he needs to do work on an upgrader too. :) WarnerReceived on Sun Aug 15 2010 - 19:50:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC