Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Alexander Motin <mav_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> Brandon Gooch wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Alexander Motin <mav_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> Now uncommitted pass_autosence.patch and possibly cdrtools.patch. >>> OK. Patched kernel and cdrtools has resulted in a working cdrecord >>> (burned an ISO successfully) and an endless stream of: >>> >>> ... >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): Requesting SCSI sense data >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status error >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): Requesting SCSI sense data >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status error >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): Requesting SCSI sense data >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status error >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): Requesting SCSI sense data >>> (pass0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status error >>> ... >> I think it can be hald probing for media insertion. Probably we should >> slightly reduce error logging verbosity. May be somehow make to not log >> errors on requests submitted from user-level via pass driver. >> >>> But most important part: It works, and it burned very quickly! The CD >>> was created, and fully functional (I booted the Fedora image and >>> completed an installation). >> Nice! > > What are your thoughts on committing this (or something like it)? > Should I just keep a local patch set for the semi-long-term? Do you > have something else in the works? I wanted to do something with these logs first, as they are hardly acceptable, but was distracted by different project. Unless somebody take it, I'll be back to it later. -- Alexander MotinReceived on Fri Dec 24 2010 - 20:11:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC