On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Eirik Ã~Xverby wrote: > > On 8. jan. 2010, at 16.33, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >> On 30 Nov 2009, at 19:13, Eirik Øverby wrote: >> >>> I meant NFS-UDP ... However I was wrong even there; Using NFS over UDP from FreeBSD boxes does not cause the same issue. So OpenBSD seems to be a special case here. >>> As a data point, I tried to reproduce it here using an OpenBSD4.5 client and wasn't able to see a leak. So it might be only certain versions of OpenBSD or certain network configs or ??? (I used NFSv3 over UDP.) I doubt it, but if the version of OpenBSD you were using happened to use NFSv2 by default with UDP vs NFSv3 for TCP, there is a patch that fixes an mbuf leak, that is specific to NFSv2. However, if you were using NFSv3 over UDP, then this won't be relevant. I can look at a packet trace, but I kinda doubt that it's going to shed light on the cause of the mbuf leak. ("tcpdump -s 0 -w <file> host <server>" should get a packet capture that Wireshark will make sense of.) rickReceived on Fri Jan 08 2010 - 20:38:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC