On 8. jan. 2010, at 22.48, Rick Macklem wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Eirik Ã~Xverby wrote: > >> >> On 8. jan. 2010, at 16.33, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>> On 30 Nov 2009, at 19:13, Eirik Øverby wrote: >>> >>>> I meant NFS-UDP ... However I was wrong even there; Using NFS over UDP from FreeBSD boxes does not cause the same issue. So OpenBSD seems to be a special case here. >>>> > As a data point, I tried to reproduce it here using an OpenBSD4.5 client and wasn't able to see a leak. So it might be only certain versions of > OpenBSD or certain network configs or ??? (I used NFSv3 over UDP.) > > I doubt it, but if the version of OpenBSD you were using happened to > use NFSv2 by default with UDP vs NFSv3 for TCP, there is a patch that > fixes an mbuf leak, that is specific to NFSv2. However, if you were > using NFSv3 over UDP, then this won't be relevant. 10.1.5.200:/data/backup/alge.anart.no on /mnt type nfs (v3, tcp, timeo=100) 10.1.5.200:/data/backup/alge.anart.no on /mnt2 type nfs (v3, udp, timeo=100) The first one is the mount I'm currently using (v3, tcp), which does not cause the problem. The second one is the result of mount 10.1.5.200:/data/backup/alge.anart.no /mnt2 and it does, though it's OpenBSD 4.4, default to v3 udp. I'll try gathering a trace next week. Any other ideas, let me know. /Eirik > I can look at a packet trace, but I kinda doubt that it's going to > shed light on the cause of the mbuf leak. > ("tcpdump -s 0 -w <file> host <server>" should get a packet capture > that Wireshark will make sense of.) > > rick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Fri Jan 08 2010 - 21:01:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC