Em 2010.07.06. 17:54, Anonymous escreveu: >> BTW, I think there is regression in iconv(1). It wasn't there in iconv_base_integrate2.diff. >> >> (gdb) r >> Starting program: /usr/bin/iconv >> During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type. >> During symbol reading, cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 11006. >> During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type. >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> 0x0000000000401281 in main (argc= >> During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers (e.g., rax) at 0x401180. >> 0, argv=0x7ffffffefb98) at /a/blah/usr.bin/iconv/iconv.c:198 >> 198 if ((strcmp(opt_f, "") == 0)&& (strcmp(opt_t, "") == 0)) >> (gdb) bt f >> #0 0x0000000000401281 in main (argc=0, argv=0x7ffffffefb98) at /a/blah/usr.bin/iconv/iconv.c:198 >> fp =<value optimized out> >> opt_f = 0x0 >> opt_t = 0x0 >> ch =<value optimized out> >> i =<value optimized out> >> opt_c = false >> opt_s = false >> (gdb) p *argv >> $1 = 0x0 >> > It works if I specify both `-t' and `-f'. And crashes when none > specified or only one of them. > Thanks, I've fixed this and the mtree problem, as well. I hope this one now works properly on amd64: http://kovesdan.org/patches/iconv-20100708.diff GaborReceived on Thu Jul 08 2010 - 13:32:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC