Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:32:21 +0200
Em 2010.07.06. 17:54, Anonymous escreveu:
>> BTW, I think there is regression in iconv(1). It wasn't there in iconv_base_integrate2.diff.
>>
>>    (gdb) r
>>    Starting program: /usr/bin/iconv
>>    During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type.
>>    During symbol reading, cannot get low and high bounds for subprogram DIE at 11006.
>>    During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type.
>>
>>    Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>    0x0000000000401281 in main (argc=
>>    During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers (e.g., rax) at 0x401180.
>>    0, argv=0x7ffffffefb98) at /a/blah/usr.bin/iconv/iconv.c:198
>>    198             if ((strcmp(opt_f, "") == 0)&&  (strcmp(opt_t, "") == 0))
>>    (gdb) bt f
>>    #0  0x0000000000401281 in main (argc=0, argv=0x7ffffffefb98) at /a/blah/usr.bin/iconv/iconv.c:198
>>            fp =<value optimized out>
>>            opt_f = 0x0
>>            opt_t = 0x0
>>            ch =<value optimized out>
>>            i =<value optimized out>
>>            opt_c = false
>>            opt_s = false
>>    (gdb) p *argv
>>    $1 = 0x0
>>      
> It works if I specify both `-t' and `-f'. And crashes when none
> specified or only one of them.
>    
Thanks, I've fixed this and the mtree problem, as well. I hope this one 
now works properly on amd64:
http://kovesdan.org/patches/iconv-20100708.diff

Gabor
Received on Thu Jul 08 2010 - 13:32:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC