On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Brooks Davis <brooks_at_freebsd.org> writes: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." > > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with > clang/llvm"? That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it. As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating it as a target is a good idea. -- Brooks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC