On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:23:32AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Brooks Davis <brooks_at_freebsd.org> writes: > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > > > > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." > > > > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with > > clang/llvm"? > > That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it. > > As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc > misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating > it as a target is a good idea. > You might add a first step to fix FreeBSD's libelf incompatibilities with other libelf implementations. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-05/msg00381.html -- SteveReceived on Tue Jun 01 2010 - 15:10:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC