Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

From: b. f. <bf1783_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:53 +0000
On 6/4/10, b. f. <bf1783_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 6/4/10, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_icyb.net.ua> wrote:
>> on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following:
>>> Mark Linimon wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:

>
> NetBSD allows one to set HAVE_BINUTILS=2.19 and use
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/external/gpl3/?only_with_tag=MAIN
>
> See the README there for their policy statement.  I think they decided
> to bite the bullet and allow optional use of the later version because
> it was becoming increasingly hard to support some of their many
> architectures with the old stuff.  But no doubt their mailing lists
> have more information.

I should say that, with reference to the NetBSD changes I mentioned
earlier, and John Baldwin's comments about having a GPLv3 toolchain
option in our own tree, that despite NetBSD's cautious policy
statement regarding GPLv3-licensed software in their base system, and
their requirement that such software should be optional, it appears
that use of such software is now their _default_ since Nov. 2009:

http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk.diff?r1=1.593&r2=1.594&only_with_tag=MAIN&f=h

b.
Received on Fri Jun 04 2010 - 10:49:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC