Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:44:29 +0200

Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely7.cicely.de> writes:
> Amazing - this is one of the things which can get nasty if you try some
> kind of microtuning.

Only if you break the rules.  Bad code is always bad, even if it
sometimes works by accident.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Sun Jun 13 2010 - 13:46:41 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bernd Walter: "Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations"
Previous message: Norikatsu Shigemura: "[OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue"
In reply to: Bernd Walter: "Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations"
Next in thread: Bernd Walter: "Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations"
Reply: Bernd Walter: "Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC