Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations

From: Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely7.cicely.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:00:35 +0200
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 05:44:29PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely7.cicely.de> writes:
> > Amazing - this is one of the things which can get nasty if you try some
> > kind of microtuning.
> 
> Only if you break the rules.  Bad code is always bad, even if it
> sometimes works by accident.

To expect that function calls are replaced with other functions isn't a
very obvious rule.

-- 
B.Walter <bernd_at_bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
Received on Sun Jun 13 2010 - 14:00:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC