Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:56:56 +0200

Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl> writes:
> In my opinion, we should just rename mailwrapper to whateverwrapper
> and list the lpr programs in there as well.

Take a look at /etc/alternatives in any Debian-based Linux distro...

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Thu Jun 24 2010 - 11:59:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anton Shterenlikht: "Re: r209240 ia64 -> buildworld -> undefined reference to `lzma_physmem'"
Previous message: Ed Schouten: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)]"
In reply to: Ed Schouten: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)]"
Next in thread: Peter Pentchev: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr"
Reply: Peter Pentchev: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC