Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:37:36 -0400

On Friday 25 June 2010 7:40:11 am David Wolfskill wrote:
> Well, one one of my machines -- I realize that there are some
> machines for which it's been problematic for a while.  And all of
> the machines I'm using run FreeBSD/i386.

209469 perhaps?

-- 
John Baldwin

Received on Fri Jun 25 2010 - 11:29:40 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rui Paulo: "HEADS UP: removal of acpi_aiboost(4)"
Previous message: David Wolfskill: "Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"
In reply to: David Wolfskill: "Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"
Next in thread: David Wolfskill: "Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"
Reply: David Wolfskill: "Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC