On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:27:06 +0300, Alex Keda <admin_at_lissyara.su> wrote: > On 05.03.2010 14:16, Doug Rabson wrote: >> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:10:43 +0300, Alex Keda<admin_at_lissyara.su> wrote: >> >>> On 05.03.2010 13:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> >>>> In message<4B90E171.2040808_at_lissyara.su>, Alex Keda writes: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or >>>>> >> ManagedBSD? >> >>>>> =) >>>>> or something abstract? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You are free to use any other operating system of your choice, if you >>>> are not happy with FreeBSD. >>>> >>>> Don't let the door hit you on the way out. >>>> >>>> >>> I'm not going anywhere, not even hope for it =) >>> I'm trying to make FreeBSD a better, more logical. >>> Maybe that's not very successful, but judging by the number of >>> responses, it hurt many, and made to think even more people. >>> >> I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this >> discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the same >> way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the >> consequences for long-term maintenance and supporting downstream >> contributors outweigh any possible benefit. Having the same conversation >> every two years with the same outcome gets annoying. >> > And the fact that this issue was raised with enviable regularity - not > make you think that it really needs to be done? Read what I wrote. Consequences outweigh benefits so no. On the other hand, if you are just trolling, please try somewhere else.Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 10:32:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC